Testseek.com have collected 3 expert reviews of the Autodesk Mudbox 2013 and the average rating is 80%. Scroll down and see all reviews for Autodesk Mudbox 2013.
(80%)
3 Reviews
Average score from experts who have reviewed this product.
Users
-
0 Reviews
Average score from owners of the product.
8001003
Reviews
page 1 of 1
Order by:
Score
Published: 2012-10-04, Author: Mike , review by: studiodaily.com
Abstract: In the last half decade Autodesk has developed Mudbox into the premier 3D sculpting and painting application. An integral part of the Autodesk Entertainment Suite Mudbox 2013 ships with a much-improved interface and, this time around, much better usabilit...
New Gigatexel engin, customise and save interface layout, curve drawin, edge hardness and creasing supporte, combine bump and normal map, painting module is better than the one in ZBrus, 64bit on OS , easy interoperability with May, good import/export to
Can be issues painting inside sculpt, not as good a range of sculpting brushes as ZBrus, brushes not as natura, doesn’t support imported mirrored normal map, Mudbox can be fussy about working with some graphics cards
New Gigatexel engine, customise and save interface layouts, curve drawing, edge hardness and creasing supported, combine bump and normal maps, painting module is better than the one in ZBrush, 64-bit on OS X, easy interoperability with Maya, good import/export to 16-bit Photoshop files, 3D layers
Can be issues painting inside sculpts, not as good a range of sculpting brushes as ZBrush, brushes not as natural, doesn’t support imported mirrored normal maps, Mudbox can be fussy about working with some graphics cards
If you use Maya then it makes far more sense to go with Mudbox as a sculpting tool. The interface is similar and there's direct importing and exporting control. For new users, Mudbox offers a more logical and easy to access interface than ZBrush, though t...
