jp.testseek.com  

 
 
Search:   
 

Home » Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 3.0



Working
Please wait...

  Expert reviews    

Reviews of Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 3.0

Testseek.com have collected 35 expert reviews of the Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 3.0 and the average rating is 89%. Scroll down and see all reviews for Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 3.0.
Award: Editor’s Choice July 2010
July 2010
 
(89%)
35 Reviews
Users
-
0 Reviews
89 0 100 35

 

Reviews

page 1 of 4
Order by:
Score
 
  Published: 2011-11-19, review by: mydigitalphotos.dk

  • Inden jeg installerede Adobe Photoshop Lightroom kunne jeg ikke helt se nødvendigheden med at have flere redigeringsprogrammer, og jeg må også indrømme, at tykkelsen på min pengepung har været med til at afholde mig fra at anvende flere programmer.Da j...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(90%)
 
  Published: 2011-01-16, review by: kenstone.net

  • Abstract:  Steve Douglas Lightroom has been around for a number of years. In this 3rd incarnation there have been several improvements and added features. Not every photographer needs the massive depth and complexity of Photoshop CS5 and Lightroom 3 is capable ...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2010-12-01, review by: shutterbug.com

  • Many photographers decide to use all the tools Adobe offers for their workflow. They use PDF for comps and contact sheets, they organize images using Lightroom, and they use Photoshop for editing. It’s a wise approach, and Lightroom now runs faster, fi...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2010-11-23, review by: clubic.com

  • Départager Lightroom et Aperture est assez difficile. Jusqu'ici, Lightroom disposait d'une avance non négligeable: plus simple d'utilisation, proposant des fonctionnalités plus étendues et visiblement plus réactif selon l'avis de nombreux utilisateurs de...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2010-11-02, review by: altomdata.dk

  • Lightroom er et godt program, der dog kræver en del af brugeren. Men er du fotoentusiast, og har du lyst til at bruge penge på programmet, så er det klart det hele værd. Det er et rigtig godt program...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(80%)
 
  Published: 2010-10-15, review by: techcrunch.com

  • While some of Lightroom’s organizational principles are difficult to get used to, they can be gotten used to, and in the end it’s the photos that matter. Their processing engine, presets, and the versatility of the tools they provide within the progra...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2010-09-16, review by: zdnet.be

  • verkrijgbaar in 64bit; zowel voor Mac als Windows; uitstekende interface; tethering; ruisreductie beste die we tot nu toe zagen,
  • volledigschermmodus kan beter; geen gezichtsherkenning; duurste highend fotobeheerder op de markt.
  • Met Lightroom 3 heeft Adobe de concurrentie opgevoerd met andere high-end fotobeheerders. De nieuwste versie beschikt over veel goeds, zoals betere ruisonderdrukking en een volledige nieuwe RAW-engine. Op Mac-systemen moet Lightroom 3 Apples Aperture bove...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2010-09-14, Author: Rick , review by: techworld.com

  • The image processing enhancements in Lightroom 3 are impressive, solidifying the program’s position as one of the best tools for managing, editing and publishing photos. This isn’t a blockbuster update, but offers enough to make it well worth the upgr...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2010-09-08, review by: digitalfoto.dk

  • Abstract:  Billedkvaliteten fik højeste prioritet under udviklingen af Lightroom 3, og det var faktisk også tiltrængt. Konkurrenter som Capture One gav nemlig skarpere raw-billeder, DxO Optics kunne rette optikfejl, og støjreduktionen havde så begrænset værdi, at...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2010-09-08, review by: digitalfotoforalla.se

  • Abstract:  Det var bildkvaliteten som prio­riterades högst under utveck­lingen av Lightroom 3, och det var nödvändigt. Konkurrenter som Capture One gav nämligen skarpare råbilder, DxO Optics kunde korrigera objektivfel, och brusreduceringen var så in­effektiv ...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
    page 1 of 4 « Previous   1 2 3 4   Next »  
 
More popular products from the same category


Join our Consumer Panel!

  • Infuence products of the future
  • Up to 4$ per answer
TestSeek will regularly send you survey invites to your email, you choose if and when you participate.

Join now! » (opens in a new window)


×