jp.testseek.com  

 
 
Search:   
 

Home » Tamron SP AF 70-200mm f/2.8 Di LD IF Macro



Working
Please wait...

  Expert reviews    

Reviews of Tamron SP AF 70-200mm f/2.8 Di LD IF Macro

Testseek.com have collected 30 expert reviews of the Tamron SP AF 70-200mm f/2.8 Di LD IF Macro and the average rating is 59%. Scroll down and see all reviews for Tamron SP AF 70-200mm f/2.8 Di LD IF Macro.
 
(59%)
30 Reviews
Users
-
0 Reviews
59 0 100 30

 

Reviews

page 3 of 3
Order by:
Score
 
  Published: 2009-10-09, review by: magnus.de

  • Abstract:  Das Tamron (690 Euro) bleibt knapp hinter dem Nikon, fällt aber bei 200 mm weniger stark ab. Im Vergleich zum Nikon ist es damit der bessere Kauf, wenn man nur die optische Leistung betrachtet. Für das Nikon spricht der eingebaute Bildstabilisator, fü...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
  Award


-
 
  Published: 2009-10-09, review by: magnus.de

  • Abstract:  Eher ungewöhnlich für ein Telezoom leistet sich das Tamron (690 Euro) seinen Durchhänger in der mittleren Brennweite. Das Ergebnis ist insgesamt wie beim Sigma nur teilweise, nicht jedoch bei allen Brennweiten überzeugend. Technische Daten und Teste...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2009-10-09, review by: magnus.de

  • Abstract:  Das Tamron (690 Euro) kann die besten Abbildungsleistungen für sich verbuchen: Bereits offen passt die Leistung mit ordentlichem Ergebnis und maßvollem Kontrastabfall zu den Bildecken – man muss allerdings ohne Stabilisator auskommen. Digital empfohle...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
  Award


-
 
  Published: 2009-09-09, review by: magnus.de

  • Abstract:  Das lichtstarke Telezoom ist für das KB-Format gerechnet und wird an der Alpha 350 zum 105–300-mm-Zoom. Das Tamron kann mit einer guten Lichtstärke punkten, doch bleibt es bei offener Blende bei durchschnittlicher Schärfe in Weitwinkel und Tele, die e...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
  Award


-
 
  Published: 2009-07-28, review by: kamerabild.se

  • När det gäller de kortare telezoomarna i den övre prisklassen så har både Canon och Pentax klara vinnare. Canons 70-200/4l is är förstahandsvalet för Canonägaren. Det erbjuder både bildstabilisering och en...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2009-07-21, review by: Photoradar.com

  • On paper, a lens like this Tamron 70-200mm f2.8 doesn’t sound so very different from 55-200mm budget models. In practice, they’re a world apart. Budget 55-200mm lenses are lightweight, plasticky, and designed for APS-C digital SLRs and owners just look...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(100%)
 
  Published: 2009-01-01, review by: practicalphotography.com

  • & valueImage quality is excellent but the lens is seriously let down by niggles with its autofocus system. Photographers who want to shoot sports or action should probably consider other products instead – besides, this lens is the only one that does...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(60%)
 
  Published: 2008-11-01, review by: shutterbug.com

  • Abstract:  Because of the increasing number of D-SLRs with full-frame sensors, Tamron is upgrading several of their multi-platform lenses to the Digitally Integrated standard. The most recent model, the 70-200mm f/2.8 Di, is optimized for D-SLRs regardless of th...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2008-09-13, review by: magnus.de

  • Abstract:  Technische Daten und TestergebnisseTechnischen Daten Linsen, Gruppen18 Linsen, 13 GruppÄquivalente KB-Brennweite, AF-Bereich112–320 mm, 0,95-∞ meffektiver Bildwinkel diagonal22–8°Filter (Größe, Typ)77 mm, SchraubfilterLänge, Durchmesser, Gewicht195...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2008-06-25, review by: The-digital-picture.com

  • Abstract:  The Tamron 70-200mm f/2.8 Di Macro Lens review is coming, but Im waiting (at this moment at least) for a replacement lens. My first copy of the Tamron 70-200mm f/2.8 Di Macro Lens exhibited very soft right side due mostly to a curved focus plane. Ove...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
    page 3 of 3 « Previous   1 2 3   Next »  
 
More popular products from the same category


Join our Consumer Panel!

  • Infuence products of the future
  • Up to 4$ per answer
TestSeek will regularly send you survey invites to your email, you choose if and when you participate.

Join now! » (opens in a new window)


×