jp.testseek.com  

 
 
Search:   
 

Home » Fujifilm X70



Working
Please wait...

  Expert reviews    

Reviews of Fujifilm X70

Testseek.com have collected 78 expert reviews of the Fujifilm X70 and the average rating is 85%. Scroll down and see all reviews for Fujifilm X70.
Award: Editor’s Choice March 2016
March 2016
 
(85%)
78 Reviews
Users
(86%)
28 Reviews
85 0 100 78

 

Reviews

page 4 of 8
Order by:
Score
 
  Published: 2016-04-20, review by: pcauthority.com.au

  • Fair play to Fujifilm. It's once again produced a very nice camera that with bags of appeal. Only this time around, it's not only those celebrating a modest lottery win that will be able to afford an X series snapper.Granted, the X70 isn't cheap, but you...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
  Award


(100%)
 
  Published: 2016-04-19, review by: stuff.tv

  • Affordable price, Sizeable APS-C sensor, Touch-sensitive display
  • No zoom, No viewfinder
  • Fair play to Fujifilm. It's once again produced a very nice camera that with bags of appeal. Only this time around, it's not only those celebrating a modest lottery win that will be able to afford an X series snapper. Granted, the X70 isn't cheap, but yo...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(100%)
 
  Published: 2016-04-19, review by: stuff.tv/my/

  • Affordable price, Sizeable APS-C sensor, Touch-sensitive display
  • No zoom, No viewfinder
  • Fair play to Fujifilm. It's once again produced a very nice camera that with bags of appeal. Only this time around, it's not only those celebrating a modest lottery win that will be able to afford an X series snapper.Granted, the X70 isn't cheap, but you...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(100%)
 
  Published: 2016-04-19, review by: ichip.ru

  • Результаты тестирования Fujifilm X70Соотношение цена/качествоПревосходноСоотношение цена/качество: 100Качество изображения (45%): 88.7Оснащение и управление (40%): 93.9Быстродействие (15%): 85.6Результаты тестированияМетодика тестированияПоставьте оценку—...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(90%)
 
  Published: 2016-04-18, Author: Samuel , review by: dpreview.com

  • Film Simulation modes are superb and even more accessible with new control ring, Smart and handy builtin interval timer shooting, USB charging can save the day, Tilting touchscreen adds versatility to this segment, Incamera Raw conversion lets you gain fu
  • Critical detail at 100% suffers, Waxylooking skin in high ISO images, AF tends to hunt, Lens is not as high of quality as its rivals, 16MP XTrans sensor is at the end of its life, No viewfinder, XTrans sensor design limits Rawconverter choice, Lack of ext
  • The Fujifilm X70 is definitely one of the simplest 28mm-equivalent APS-C compact cameras on the market. It is well optimized for sharing and shooting, but falls a bit below the incredibly high Raw image quality bar set by the Ricoh GR. Even so, it present...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
(76%)
 
  Published: 2016-04-08, Author: 吉姆林 , review by: mobile01.com

  • Abstract:  從年初到現在最有話題的隨身機想必就是富士X70,從發表到鋪貨的動作遠比C/N/S三家要快,且合理的售價也讓消費者甘願掏出錢包來買單,另一個特點就是X70也支援自拍及觸控,在小編的前一篇文章裡已為大家帶來完整的測試報告;所以這次特別找來X70可敬的對手「GR II」來一較高下!畢竟它們在規格上有許多相近之處,不論是片幅、畫素、焦長、光圈...等等,幾乎都是平起平坐,更因為如此要比較的項目就會更細、更繁瑣,但也唯獨這樣才能壓榨出雙機的極限!這次除了強調畫質方面的差異,另外在風景與膚色的詮釋上也有殘酷的較量,對...

 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2016-04-07, Author: Dominik , review by: fotomaniak.pl

  • Bardzo dobra jakość zdjęć, Szybki autofokus, Niewielkie rozmiary, Stylistyka retro.
  • Słaba łączność WIFI, Niezbyt wydajny akumulator, Ubogi tryb filmowy, Brak stabilizacji
  • WadyTrudno znaleźć w tym modelu jakieś wady, które naprawdę byłyby znaczące. Można wskazać na pewno słabe połączenie WIFI, niezbyt wydajny akumulator, czy bufor, który pomieści raptem kilka zdjęć w trybie seryjnym. Do tego należało by dodać stosunkowo ubo...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
  Award


(90%)
 
  Published: 2016-04-06, review by: higashisa.com

  • まったくの初心者にはオススメしにくいけど、普段からデジカメで写真や動画を撮っている人なら最高の28mm写真が撮れるのでオススメ。フジフイルムのカメラは、他社メーカーにはない体験がたくさん詰まっています。ほんとの本音で、多くの人に一度使ってもらいたいカメラですね。...

Read the full review »    
Google translate to English »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
 
  Published: 2016-04-02, Author: Karol , review by: benchmark.pl

  • sensor APS-C X-Trans CMOS II, pliki RAW o sporym potencjale lecz trudne w obróbce, wysoka jakość obrazu w niemal całym kadrze, ładne kolory na obrazach JPEG, niewielki, jasny obiektyw, dobrze radzi sobie pod światło, celny i dość szybki AF, bardzo dobra p
  • …niewielkich rozmiarów przyciski i wąski pierścień wokół obiektywu, jakość filmów mogłaby być lepsza, okazjonalne problemy AF w słabym oświetleniu, brak jakiegokolwiek wizjera, brak stabilizacji, tylko jedna ogniskowa (nie każdy uzna to za wadę)
  • Karol ŻebruńSzef strefy FotoFotoA ACzy wady to na pewno wady?I tak dotarliśmy do ostatniej części recenzji. Pora na wydanie opinii i wyciągnięcie wniosków. Spróbujmy wypisać cechy, które potencjalny użytkownik może uznać za największe wady i subiektywne k...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
  Award


(90%)
 
  Published: 2016-03-31, review by: popco.net

  • Abstract:  발전은 반드시 더함에만 있지 않다. 종종 우리는 훌훌 털어내 간결해진 것에서 혁신을 경험하기도 한다. 후지필름이 이 카메라를 완벽하게 새로운 X로 소개한 것도 그런 이유가 아닐까? 실제로 뷰파인더의 부재와 새롭게 추가된 터치 인...

Read the full review »
 
Was this review helpful?   
 
-
    page 4 of 8 « Previous   1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8   Next »  
 
More popular products from the same category


Join our Consumer Panel!

  • Infuence products of the future
  • Up to 4$ per answer
TestSeek will regularly send you survey invites to your email, you choose if and when you participate.

Join now! » (opens in a new window)


×